Watching The Olympics

Try watching the Olympics in a mixed nationality household and it is mayhem.  Mr. Jules, who came third in the 600metres Swiss Championships aged 13 and thus sees himself as an authority, is convinced that all the British athletes are drugged.  He includes the sailors – whose skills, last time I looked, are purely tactical and cerebral – and now since the Norwegians were stripped of their medals after their horses tested positive, our horses too. 

But it is not just the British he objects to – the Jamaicans are also using performance enhancing drugs, especially Bolt (… and Phelps’ swimming briefs are solar powered).  He has been reading his bible The Weltwoche (right wing rag printed on recycled paper) which backs up his convictions with trumped up opinions and dredged up evidence by disgruntled Swiss journos.  He storms out of the kitchen (we tend to watch the daily round-up over dinner) whenever I switch to the BBC “because all they ever talk about is Team GB, not Switzerland or any other nation” - eh alors?  (Actually it is also because I have a crush on Michael Johnson).   Thus we are forced to watch the adrenalin charged Eurosports most of the time.  I say WE because in spite of living in Switzerland and having dual passports the munchkins have turned proudly British this week.  

Call me idealistic and naive but I refuse to believe that Usain Bolt and Team GB are taking drugs.  Usain is just a beautiful evolutionary freak of nature.  In any case to take Mr. Jules’ cynical view is to live in a world not worth living in or fighting for.

Round Two:  Mr. Jules is all fired up:  The Jamaican drug controller just happens to be the Jamaican team doctor; growth hormones cannot be detected 48 hours after use so they are freezing blood tests in the hope that someday they will be able to prove that growth hormones were used.  Then I presume they will go back and strip them all of their medals and what a sorry day that will be for us all. 

According to Mr. Jules, the only reason the Swiss have not excelled at these Olympics is because they are the only nation not taking drugs.  The Swiss are a proud bunch, but the reason they are not doing as well as they would wish at these Olympics is simply because they have neither a big enough talent pool to dip into or the means to exploit that talent. You can’t win them all.   

PS I suggested to Mr. Jules that maybe he only came third at the Swiss Championships in 1973 because the other two were drugged.  It was fleeting but I detected a momentary glint in the eyes. 

copyright Julesritter August 2008

 

 

Jules said,

August 22, 2008 @ 7:07 am

John Norris
john@jnorris.org.uk | 84.45.223.17

I confess that I really don’t care about the Olympics. I would like them to be over more quickly, or better still, not happen.

I have never been interested in watching people running round and round in circles, or similar athletic feats. I had to do that in the rain and mud at public school, and as soon as I could, I never touched it again. Among the professional athletes, the margins between ’success’ and ‘failure’ are often tiny. I wish we didn’t make so much fuss about the difference, or celebrate it with quite so much nationalist chauvinism.

Great swathes of BBC programming are devoted to the Olympics when I would rather have the opportunity to watch something other than endless repeats of British victories over my breakfast. I have never liked our national anthem. If I were an enthusiastic supporter of any other nation, such as Mr Jules’ Switzerland, I suspect I would be heartily sick of the doings of ‘Team GB’ by now. Such is fame, and celebrity.

Unlike him – at least by your account – I don’t believe the British competitors are all junkies and cheats. Most are probably honest, nice enough, and oddly enthusiastic – and rather boring. But I do believe sufficient of various nationalities cheat, to cast doubt over the results. There is no doubt that has included some members and former members of the mighty ‘Team GB’.

Perhaps one should have competitions for those who are caught and judged pharmaceutically aided, rather like the paralympic competitions for those adjudged handicapped – in mindnumbing categories, with additional scope for cheating – or who have undergone organ transplants? One could even have a special category for those who cheated but were allowed to get away with it, such as one British medal winner in Peking. It might underline the essentially pointless nature of the competitions.

Graham said,

August 22, 2008 @ 8:13 am

This Sporting Life.

I take beta blockers to keep my blood pressure down and am therefore banned from competing in Olympic archery and shooting events. I am also banned from championship darts and snooker. Being a left hander, I am banned from polo. I suffer from hydrophobia so swimming, yachting and rowing are out too. I once ran round the Olympic Stadium track in Barcelona but age, arthritis and weight now make this feat a distant memory. A horse fell on me at the Sotogrande Polo Club and since then I have had a morbid fear of anything equine, so dressage and point-to-point must be left to others.

But I watch it all on the telly, and it’s bloody marvellous. The athletes are all heroes from Super Stars Bolt and Phelps right down to the little guy who fell of his bike in the first 10 metres of a qualifying heat. They deserve all the praise and media fawning they can get.

I’m going out for a walk now, but only as far as the car.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI


Leave a Comment